Canon PIXMA PRO-1 Review

April 17, 2013 | Jon Canfield | Printer Reviews | Rating star Rating star Rating star Rating star

There are two paper paths available for the Pro-1. Both are located at the top of the printer, the front being for standard photo papers and able to hold multiple sheets, and a manual feed path designed for single sheets of heavy weight fine art papers. Technically this is a 13x19 printer, but the manual patch can actually handle paper up to 14” wide. This is a benefit since there is a very wide margin required for fine art papers.

Color accuracy was excellent using the provided profiles with Canon's own luster photo paper as well as their fine art media. I also did a number of prints with my preferred media - Moab Entrada and Lasal Exhibition Luster (profiles for these and many other companies are available at their respective companies websites).

Canon PIXMA PRO-1

Canon PIXMA PRO-1

Blues and reds look very good with no color shift as is common for inkjet photos. There's a bit of a learning curve involved with Canon's profiles though. Names don't always match with what you are using. For example, with semi-gloss or luster papers, there are two options available - a 1/2 and a 3. I could find no indication of which profile was which, and finally gave in with a call to Canon support. As it turns out, the 1/2 profiles are higher quality (think Best) than the 3 (think Normal).  I found that printing through the Canon Easy-PhotoPrint Pro plug-in in Photoshop gave me the best results when using Canon media, but when printing to Moab papers I used Photoshop managed color with the Moab created profiles.

Canon PIXMA PRO-1

I was very anxious to try black and white prints to see how the new 5 monochrome system worked. Along with the normal matte black, photo black, gray, and light gray, there is a dark gray. Tonal gradations were the best I've seen on a ink jet print. Typically I will spend quite a bit of time fine tuning my workflow for monochrome printing to get the best possible tones, but out of the box, the Pro-1 was excellent.

I ran the same print through a Epson R3000, and while the coated papers were very similar, I found that on fine art papers the Epson had a clear edge in reproducing deep blacks with the matte black ink. I was unable to match these deep blacks with the Canon on any fine art media. Without a side by side comparison you likely wouldn't notice this difference and I wouldn't call it a problem - just a difference in density.

Canon PIXMA PRO-1

Canon PIXMA PRO-1

There was a bit of an issue for me at first when switching from the front to the rear feed paths. You must have the other feed cover closed or nothing prints - you'll just have a blinking light to figure out what needs to be corrected. After a few prints it becomes second nature though.

Canon PIXMA PRO-1

Canon PIXMA PRO-1

Ink use was very good, as I've come to expect from Canon printers. The larger tanks are clearly an advantage in a studio that prints a high volume of photos. Matte black seems to be the quickest color to go even though I printed approximately the same number of prints on both fine art and photo papers.

Conclusion

As a completely new model, the PIXMA PRO-1 is an outstanding addition to the 13x19 market for anyone looking for a printer that can handle higher volumes. At $999 it's not targeted at the casual user - the new PIXMA PRO-10 (a replacement for the 9500 Mark II) is more likely to appeal to this user. If you need to print panoramas or on roll media, the Epson R3000 is also a good option.

4 stars

Ratings (out of 5)
Design 4.5
Features 4
Ease-of-use 4
Image quality 4.5
Value for money 4

Your Comments

Loading comments…